Monday, April 29, 2013


Over the course of this semester I really have enjoyed Sport and Gender. I thought our class was the perfect size to have a lot of good discussions where everyone felt comfortable voicing their own opinion. Usually people do not say what is on their mind in class, but I thought everyone weighed in and gave different views on a variety of topics. My favorite topic that we talked about was the Jordan Effect. I feel that a lot of people know Michael Jordan, but do not look beyond his basketball career. If anything, I think MJ is just as good of a businessman as a basketball player. It is good to see an athlete not blow millions of dollars and file for bankruptcy two years after their playing career (Allen Iverson). I also liked the debate about the entire topic of gay athletes and find extremely ironic that a NBA player came out today. Jason Collins, 34 year old NBA free agent just told Sports Illustrated today that he is gay. If you ask me, I could not think of a worse time for Collins to come out. He is a 34 year old center who is currently a free agent. I think it is going to be extremely interesting to see if anyone in the NBA will sign him now. Owners can easily use the excuse that he is too old when really they just do not want to deal with the publicity they would receive from everywhere the team traveled.
Once again, this was a very interesting class and good luck to everyone in their future endeavors.
-Taylor Redd

Conclusion        

         I would have to say that some of my favorite aspects about this semester were the in class discussions that we had. Never before have I been in a class, were the group discussions were so intriguing to listen to throughout the semester. As a result, I believed this helped me retain information about the topics that we went over this semester. Another aspect that I enjoyed about the class was all the blogs that we did each week. I thought there was numerous times throughout the semester where students did a really good job of starting debates with current issues happening in sports. By doing these blogs throughout the semester, I was able to gather more intel from students and see different sides of arguments from students within the class. From this class I was able to learn about the problems that exist within sports for gender equality, sexual orientation, and the impacts that sports has on society. I think one of my favorite readings this semester was "Cool Pose" by Majors. The reason why I loved this reading was due to the statistics it revealed about black male athletes. Before, ever reading this article I had never thought about the social status of athletes and how it can be limited by sports. Or be a way of expressing behaviors, attitudes, speech, or gestures within sports. The last aspect that I loved about this semester was our final group presentations. I thought the presentation that my group did about the difference in pay between genders in sports was intriguing. I knew heading into our final presentation that women did not make as much money or get paid equally as men in any sport. Until our final presentation revealed that women and men are equally paid in tennis.

By Anthony Pape

Sunday, April 28, 2013

The Rooney Rule Presentation


On Friday I attended a presentation by Dr. Cho’s graduate class on the Rooney Rule. The Rooney Rule is a regulation by the league that was created to make sure that minority coaches were considered for head coaching positions. Basically, the rule requires teams to interview a minority candidate for any head coaching or GM position vacancy. As they talked about in the presentation, prior to 2006 only 8 minority head coaches were hired in the NFL which is absolutely ridiculous in my opinion. With so few minorities being hired, the candidates started to question more and more about why they weren’t getting jobs. Once they came up with the conclusion that it might have been due to race, the NFL decided to implement what became known as the Rooney Rule in 2006 to avoid class-action suits. Since the Rooney Rule was put in action, the overall percentage of minority coaches jumped to around 22% in 2006. Although it seemed like the Rooney Rule was going to do some good things, more recently, at the end of last year’s football season, no minority coaches or general managers were hired to fill the 15 vacancies that became available. After hearing that, I personally believe that some of the owner’s that hire these head coaches and gm’s are racist. I don’t know how 15 different positions can become available and not one minority coach is qualified enough to fill that role. If I was the gm and my best candidate for the position was I minority, I certainly would choose the minority over the less qualified Caucasian. My beliefs are, no matter what race, religion, gender, etc you are, if you’re the best person available for the job then you will get it. With this being said, I feel like the NFL teams are just interviewing minority coaches in order to just comply with the rule and not get in trouble. I think that is totally wrong and some changes should be made to make the rule better and even more fair for minority coaches. The graduate class proposed 4 different options to try and make the rule better, but the ones that I liked the best were proposal #1 and #4. If #1 was to be enacted then teams would have to explain why the specific minority coach was selected for an interview with the team. Also, after the interview took place, if the minority candidate was not chosen, the team would have to explain why he was not selected. I like this idea because it makes the NFL teams explain why exactly he was chosen for an interview and if he doesn’t end up getting chosen, then teams also have to say why and not just assume it was because of race. This could help eliminate those random interviews with minorities just to meet the requirements of the league and to not really care in hiring a minority coach if that is truly the reason. Lastly, the other proposal I liked was have a consulting group that works alongside the NFL owners to provide them with a list of candidates to interview. I like this idea, because it tells the teams what coaches they have to interview because they would fit their style of play or game plans. This proposal again helps to eliminate random interviews just to fulfill the leagues rules and not get fined or punished.

 

By Josh Gibson  

Sister Act VI: The Williams Sisters at Indian Wells (Spencer, 2004, 2011) - Study Guide Question


1.     Be able to define and give examples of various types of racism discussed in this article (e.g., “scientific,” “cultural,” and “commodity”). In addition, what is meant by “sincere fictions” and how do they operate?
  • Scientific racism – using scientific ways like craniometry (measurement of skull size) and phernology (belief studying the conformation of skull size enable measurement of mental capacity).
    • Ethnic minorities are on average less intelligent than whites
  • Cultural racism – racism judged based on language, dress, musical preference, sporting identifications and religion.
  • Commodity racism – products sold through illustrations of colonial conquest and slave trading on commercial goods.
  • Sincere fictions – personal ideological constructions that reproduce societal mythologies at the individual level. White individuals usually see themselves as “not racist,” as “good people.”
2.     Based upon the experiences of the Williams sisters at Indian Wells in 2001, do you believe they should return to Indian Wells? Be able to explain why or why not.
  • I do not think that they will return until they get an apology. They did not deserve to be treated so badly. If the same situation happened to a white player, nothing close to this would have happened. It is good that they are not planning to go back because that shows pride. They are showing everyone that they should be treated equally and with respect.


-Marcus Kok

Conclusion (Derek Miller)


By: Derek Miller

My favorite part of this semester in Sport and Gender class was all of the great discussions we had as a class.  The discussions were my favorite part because it gave me the opportunity to hear other peoples’ opinions on controversial topics.  Often times, professors stand in front of the class and lecture without ever opening the class up to discussion.  I greatly benefitted from the in class discussions because some of the opinions of my classmates were informative.  Another awesome part of the in class discussions was hearing the personal stories from Dr. Spencer and the rest of the students in the class.  As a result, I feel like I gained knowledge about certain issues that I will be able to use in the future.  I could go on and on about how much I enjoyed the in class discussions, but I will just add one final thing.  The in class discussions show how diverse a class is.  I remember in our class we had someone who read bodybuilding magazines, while the rest of the class didn’t.  One of the funniest moments from class this semester was when Dr. Spencer thought the writing on the board was Japanese, but Marcus corrected her and said it was Chinese.  When Dr. Spencer has the in class discussions it’s almost like everyone in the class is teacher, and that is what I enjoyed the most, and where I feel I learned the most.  All of the readings from class offered a ton of useful information.  “Cool Pose” and the article about Kobe Bryant both offered great information about the way black male athletes are viewed in America.  I also enjoyed doing the presentation.  I had a great group who was willing to step outside the box and do a “mock draft” presentation.  My entire group bought into the idea and I feel Josh, Marcus, and Anthony did incredibly well.  All of the other presentations were also informative.  I liked learning about the women in extreme sports, as well as the payment differences in the major sports.   it was interesting to see how much different tennis is!  I want to be a football coach, so I feel like all of the information in this class was useful.  Imagine this, 20 years from now I could have a player that is gay that is thinking about coming out.  This class informed me about the possible actions I could take as a coach.  Honestly, other majors should be required to take this class!  Business majors could greatly benefit from the information in this class.  

Thank you for a great semester!

Friday, April 26, 2013

Conclusion by Anthony Alford

By Anthony Alford

Going into this class, I did not have much excitement about the class because I thought I wasn’t interested in gender differences in sport. But what made this class great were our discussions and readings about topics that get little to no attention in sports. For example, I have never even heard of the Indian Wells Tournament until it was discussed in class. This is surprising because the incident surrounding that 2001 tournament involved the two biggest stars in tennis.
What I found most useful was the discussions and blogs. The discussions was perhaps my favorite aspect of any of my college courses because we all had different ideas on certain situations and we all had reasons to back it up. I loved how during the first week of classes, Dr. Spencer made the class feel comfortable talking to each other about deep issues in sport and gender. The blogs have given me an opportunity to express my thoughts on issues that should be covered more by the media. I also love the responses to the blogs because everyone won’t agree with you and they will give you reasons to not agree with you. Until I took this class, I had trouble with people disagreeing with my points, but I grew up mentally thanks to these assignments.

The topic that stood out to me is gays in professional sport. Ironically, two major events in relation to this topic took place during this semester; Manti Te’o’s made-up girlfriend after the BCS National Championship game and Brittney Griner coming out as gay publicly after the WNBA Draft. There comes a point in society when it just becomes time to take the next step in societal progress. We have made small steps in gay acceptance in sport, but for every step forward with UCLA’s “You can play” campaign, there is a step back with the Chris Culliver comments.

This was why my group decided to perform a skit in class featuring a made-up player (Trinidad James) who just “came out” after the college football season, risking his opportunity of gaining a top draft pick. Personally, it was tough to play the homophobic General Manager during the presentation. However, I used to be one of the homophobic people who couldn’t stand gay people until I came to college and gained true knowledge about how gays are just like the rest of us. American sports (especially football) need a notable gay player to “come out” because only then will the sports culture and society learn that gays are truly equal, even in sports.
Finally, there are a few things I will take from this class. First, the amount of sports discussion that we had in this class has made this class one of my favorites here in college. Secondly, the blogs have help me in my other activities including the Maxwell Project, SMA, and other future activities such as resuming my online radio show in May.

The final thing I will take from this class is the most important because it might have changed my life. Dr. Spencer made a speech in class about helping out with getting Billie Jean King here in BGSU. The speech was about taking a chance on an opportunity even when the odds are against you. It hit me that I needed to do something that would make me stand out from the pack even if I’m somewhat out of my element. I strongly encourage everyone to get involved with this project because every idea, resource, and dollar matters. The more people we have, the better. We have the golden opportunity to enhance our university to higher status and make our Sport Management Program the top program in the country and it will be us who made it happen. Think about it! I have enjoyed taking this class with Dr. Spencer and Kara and I will remember the great times we had in this class for a long time.


Thursday, April 25, 2013

Conclusion

Overall, I really enjoyed taking this class.  I took this class for enjoyment due to having all of my required courses already completed to be set to graduate next week.  This honestly was one of my favorite classes because I actually enjoyed the topics that we discussed.  I liked how he talked about the history of events in sport but we also discussed recent sports news that was happening today.  I am a sports fanatic and always stay up to date with what is going on (thanks to twitter) but it was nice to hear what others have to say about different topics and there was even some news that I didn't even hear about yet.  That was really cool.
I also enjoyed how we got to choose if we wanted to do a blog or a journal.  I chose to do a blog because I had never done a blog before and wanted to see what it was like.  I actually really enjoyed doing a blog each week and seeing what others had to say about different topics as well.  As a result, I now have my own fitness blog that I post on weekly and I have this class to thank for that!
Some of the discussions in class I wasn't even aware of.  In the beginning of the semester when we talked about Caster Semenya, I didn't even know who she was!  Which was crazy, because I am a die-hard track fan.  I never knew that there were so many different categories that an individual could fall into, I always just thought of black and white.  This class has opened my eyes to really look deeper into situations and stories and not always listen to what you hear.
I would definitely recommend this class to anyone, not only sport management majors.  I wish that this class was a requirement for Exercise Science students as well because several of exercise science students will be working in sports and with athletes and they would get a lot out of the class!

Janelle Campbell

Kobe Bryant Study Guide (Derek Miller)


By: Derek Miller

1.    Why does Leonard say that it is absurd to believe in ‘colorblind ideology,’ especially in light of some of the dialogues surrounding the allegations against Kobe Bryant?  (It is hard to believe in the colorblind ideology because there are still countless instances of black males being racially categorized in sports.  While a black athlete is a superstar, no one seems to care if he is black, but the second he miss-steps and gets negative publicity the racial criticisms of him surface.  When people say they are “colorblind”, it is almost a bit hypocritical because on one hand they are saying they are not racist, however, in the same statement, they are acknowledging that there is a difference in skin color that they are aware of.  When Kobe Bryant was accused of rape, oh boy, the claws of the general public came out quickly.  Kobe was being bashed left and right, and the fault of the crime was attributed to color of his skin.  The article asks is Kobe is the next MJ or the next OJ.  All three superstars are said to have transcended race.  The term “transcended race” has been used outside of the sports world.  President Clinton was referred to as the first black president, so the notion of colorblind ideology is not just alive in sports, but everywhere around us. However, sports leads the charge when it comes to presenting colorblind ideology) 
2.     Why does sport operate as such a powerful site of disseminating colorblind ideology?  (Sports are a powerhouse in the entertainment industry, and any ideology or way of thinking that is presented in sports will reach a massive audience.  It is no secret that most of the best athletes in sports are black.  As a result, most people cheer for black male athletes.  Cheering for black males is far outside the social norm in all other fields besides sports.  The reason sports are so powerful in disseminating colorblind ideology is because they are perhaps the only form of entertainment that promotes colorblindness in massive amounts to the public.)

Study Guide Question


What were predominant themes found by White and Gillett in “Reading the muscular body?” How did various ads in Muscle & Fitness illustrate each theme?
What is “megarexia?

The first theme is "positing the reader as inferior".  This accounts for majority of the ads in fitness magazines.  Most of the ads are dietary supplements and they are pictured with a very large muscular man who is portrayed to take these supplements and advising the reader to take them to and you will look like him.  This is not the case at all, but people read these magazines and believe it.  They will then purchase the supplement because they know they are not as muscular as the man pictured in the photo and they feel "inferior".  This is why supplement advertisements are so popular in these magazines, because everyone looks at them.  The second themes is promise of transformation.  Everyone has seen these advertisements of what an individual looked like before they took a dietary supplement and what they look like after.  It usually is a huge difference.  People may buy into these ads, which in all honesty, thats what they want you to do , and purchase these supplements and not achieve the same results.  Lets just say, photoshop plays a big role in these photographs.  The last themes is the muscular body as a sign of hegemonic masculinity.  This basically is stating that the more muscular and powerful you are, the more masculine and dominate you are.  This is shown in high amounts as you flip through the pages of any fitness magazine such as FLEX and Muscle and Fitness.  All of the men you will see photographed in the magazine are very large and muscular. 
Megarexia is the opposite of the eating disorder anorexia.  Anorexia is when people believe they're too fat and often restrict food in hopes of losing weight.  This is more common in females.  The other end of the spectrum is a term called megarexia.  This is more common in men and they feel like they can never get big enough.  These individuals will always be in the gym, lifting weight that seems impossible, and their goal is to build muscle and get much bigger.  

Janelle Campbell

The Jordan Effect Study Guide (Derek Miller)


1.     What is the “Jordan effect” and how does it reflect Jordan’s (one-time) impact on the economy? (Is there a bigger star in the sports world than Michael Jordan? Probably not. At a point in time Michael Jordan was Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, and Peyton Manning all rolled into one.  Jordan had charisma on and off the court and the magical skills that made him a legend, as a result, the economic effect around Michael Jordan was at level that may never be seen again.  Jordan had the power to promote any product and make it a success.  In class, we discussed that the mere presence of Michael Jordan in the marketing campaign turned little known sunglass brand, Oakley, into a world power in the eyewear industry.  Everything Michael Jordan touched seemed to turn to gold.  Earlier this semester, our class discussed how sports figures branch out into different areas of entertainment.  For instance, many basketball players attempt a career in the music industry.  As for Jordan, the television screen is where he made is mark off the court.  Like a fly is attracted to a big zapper, the general public was infatuated with Michael Jordan.  Michael Jordan endorsed some of the most popular products of all time, two of them being Gatorade and Nike.  Does it get much bigger than Gatorade and Nike in the sports industry?  Jordan had a lot of do with the continued economic success of both Gatorade and Nike.)